Conoscopic Observation and Interference Figures
Using convergent polarised light to observe interference figures that reveal a gemstone's optic character (uniaxial or biaxial) and optic sign – an advanced polariscope technique.
Introduction
The conoscope converts the polariscope into a device for examining interference figures –
patterns produced by convergent polarised light passing through an anisotropic gemstone. These
figures reveal whether a stone is uniaxial or biaxial and, with an accessory plate, allow
determination of the optic sign.
Conoscopic observation is a Diploma-level skill; it requires a well-polished, reasonably large
stone oriented with its optic axis approximately perpendicular to a flat facet.
Relationship to the Polariscope
The standard polariscope (crossed polars) determines whether a stone is singly refractive
(SR) or doubly refractive (DR) and gives an approximate indication of birefringence through
shadow-edge behaviour on the refractometer.
Polariscope vs Conoscope vs Bertrand Lens
- Polariscope (orthoscopic mode): Standard test – parallel polarised light; stone
rotated to identify SR, DR, or ADR behaviour. Does not show interference figures. - Conoscope (convergent mode): Converging lens added above or below the stone
to bring a strongly convergent cone of polarised light to focus within the gem.
The resulting interference figure is observed through a Bertrand lens or hand lens
above the analyser. - Bertrand lens: A small supplementary lens inserted above the analyser that focuses
the back focal plane of the objective or converging lens – making the interference
figure visible and centred.
Improvised Setup
If no dedicated conoscope attachment is available, a glass sphere (a ball bearing or
glass marble of any RI) placed above the stone in a high-RI immersion liquid acts as a
simple converging element. This improvised setup is described in standard Gem-A teaching
materials for use when a conoscope attachment is not available. Note: this improvised
method is widely described in gemmological teaching but a specific peer-reviewed paper
confirming its parameters was not retrieved during source verification – treat the
principle as established curriculum practice rather than a citable primary finding.
Conoscopic Procedure
Obtaining a usable interference figure requires careful preparation and orientation.
Stone Preparation
- Select a clean, well-polished large flat facet (ideally the table or a large pavilion
main facet). - Orient the stone so the suspected optic axis is approximately perpendicular to the
facet being examined – this usually means examining the table facet of a well-cut
stone. - For round brilliants: the table facet is a good starting orientation; for elongated
stones (marquise, oval), try both the table and a large pavilion facet.
Observation
- Set the polariscope to crossed polars (dark field).
- Place the converging lens above or below the stone.
- Insert the Bertrand lens above the analyser.
- Observe the interference figure at low magnification (if using a lens system) or
simply with the eye. - Rotate the stone stage and observe how the figure moves or remains stationary.
- For optic sign determination: insert a λ-plate (first-order red plate) or quartz
wedge and observe colour changes.
Uniaxial Interference Figure
Crystals of the trigonal, tetragonal, and hexagonal systems are uniaxial – they have one
optic axis (the c-axis).
Appearance of the Centred Uniaxial Figure
When the optic axis is perpendicular to the polished face, the centred uniaxial figure
shows:
- A stationary dark isogyre cross (Maltese cross) – the cross arms run north-south
and east-west and remain fixed as the stage rotates. - Concentric isochromatic rings surrounding the cross, corresponding to regions of
equal retardation. Higher birefringence means more rings. - The centre of the cross (where the arms intersect) is the melatope – the point
where the optic axis emerges.
Off-Centre Figure
If the optic axis is not exactly perpendicular to the face, an off-centre figure results:
the cross arms sweep through the field of view as the stage rotates, rather than
remaining fixed. The melatope is visible at the edge of or outside the field of view.
An off-centre figure still confirms uniaxial character.
Optic Sign Determination with the Lambda Plate
Insert a first-order red (λ-plate) accessory. The colour changes in the four quadrants
of the isochromatic rings indicate the optic sign:
- Uniaxial positive (+): addition colours (blue) appear in the NE–SW quadrants
(along the slow-ray direction of the λ-plate); yellow in NW–SE. - Uniaxial negative (−): addition colours in the NW–SE quadrants; yellow in NE–SW.
Important note: the exact quadrant labelling depends on the orientation convention of the
specific instrument and the direction of insertion of the λ-plate. The principle of
addition versus subtraction quadrants is standard crystallographic optics; verify the
quadrant convention against your specific polariscope's markings before reporting results.
Sturman & Parker (2010) provide a gemmological approach to optic sign determination:
Journal of Gemmology 32(1–4), 90–100 (DOI: 10.15506/jog.2010.32.1-4.90) [VERIFIED].
Biaxial Interference Figure
Crystals of the orthorhombic, monoclinic, and triclinic systems are biaxial – they have
two optic axes.
Acute Bisectrix (Bxa) Figure
Observed when looking along the bisector of the acute angle between the two optic axes:
- Two melatopes visible in the field of view (or entering/leaving during rotation).
- Curved isogyres that form a "figure-eight" shape at the 45° stage position.
- As the stage rotates 90°, the isogyres sweep apart (from a crossed position at 0°)
and then together again in the figure-eight pattern. - The separation between the two melatopes estimates the optic axial angle (2V).
Sturman (2007) provides a gemmological method for 2V estimation in biaxial gemstones:
Journal of Gemmology 30(7), 443–452 (DOI: 10.15506/jog.2007.30.7.443) [VERIFIED].
Optic Axis Figure
Observed when looking along one optic axis (OA figure):
- One melatope visible; a single isogyre sweeps through the field of view during rotation.
- Useful for confirming biaxial character but less diagnostic than the Bxa figure.
Biaxial Optic Sign
Using a λ-plate at the 45° stage position (where isogyres are most curved):
- Biaxial positive (+): isogyre curves concave toward the acute bisectrix;
addition colours appear in the concave region. - Biaxial negative (−): isogyre curves convex away from the acute bisectrix;
subtraction colours appear.
As with uniaxial sign determination, the exact interpretation depends on the instrument
orientation and λ-plate insertion direction.
Common Species Interference Figures
| Species | Crystal System | Expected Figure | Optic Sign | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quartz | Trigonal | Uniaxial; isogyre cross + rings | Negative | Relatively easy to obtain in large crystals |
| Calcite | Trigonal | Uniaxial; strong birefringence gives many rings | Negative | Classic teaching specimen |
| Corundum (ruby/sapphire) | Trigonal | Uniaxial; few rings (low birefringence) | Negative | Low birefringence; cross distinct but rings sparse |
| Topaz | Orthorhombic | Biaxial; two melatopes clearly separated | Positive | 2V ~65°; good teaching example of biaxial figure |
| Sphene (titanite) | Monoclinic | Biaxial; complex figure | Positive | Very high birefringence; many rings; 2V ~17–40° |
| Tourmaline | Trigonal | Uniaxial; strong birefringence; many rings | Negative | Rings numerous; may be hard to count |
| Peridot | Orthorhombic | Biaxial; nearly optic normal | Positive | 2V ~82–90°; melatopes far apart – may need optic axis figure |
Limitations
Sources
Key citations for this topic:
- Sturman, B. D. (2007). "Determination of the optic axial angle in biaxial gemstones and
its use in gemmology." The Journal of Gemmology 30(7), 443–452.
DOI: 10.15506/jog.2007.30.7.443 [VERIFIED] - Cartier (2003). "Directions of maximum double refraction divergence in uniaxial and biaxial
stones." The Journal of Gemmology 28(8), 489.
DOI: 10.15506/jog.2003.28.8.489 [VERIFIED] - Cartier (2004). "A new definition of optic axis for gemmology and the four kinds of optic
axis." The Journal of Gemmology 29(4), 228.
DOI: 10.15506/jog.2004.29.4.228 [VERIFIED] - Sturman, D. B. & Parker, D. (2010). "Use of the polarizing filter on the refractometer in
determinations of the optic sign or optic character of a gemstone." The Journal of
Gemmology 32(1–4), 90–100. DOI: 10.15506/jog.2010.32.1-4.90 [VERIFIED] - Hofmeister, A. M. & Mao, H.-K. (2002). American Mineralogist.
DOI: 10.2138/am-2002-0414 [APPROXIMATELY – paper is on IR polarised spectra; polariscope
operational description is curriculum-level]