Crystal Systems

The seven crystal systems and their characteristic symmetry elements.

By gemmology.dev editors Last updated
crystallography symmetry identification

Overview

All crystals belong to one of seven crystal systems, classified by their unit cell
geometry and symmetry elements. Understanding these systems is fundamental to
crystallography and gem identification.

Crystal systems are defined by the relationship between crystallographic axes
(a, b, c) and the angles between them (α, β, γ). Each system has characteristic
symmetry elements that determine possible crystal forms.

Symmetry Elements

Rotation Axes

2-fold, 3-fold, 4-fold, 6-fold rotational symmetry

Mirror Planes

Reflection symmetry planes

Center of Symmetry

Inversion through a point

The Seven Systems

Cubic (Isometric)

The highest symmetry system with four threefold axes.

Axes
a = b = c
Angles
α = β = γ = 90°
Minimum Symmetry
4 threefold axes
Point Groups
m3m, 432, -43m, m3, 23
Example Gems
Diamond Spinel Garnet Fluorite
Hexagonal

Characterized by one sixfold axis.

Axes
a₁ = a₂ = a₃ ≠ c
Angles
α = β = 90°, γ = 120°
Minimum Symmetry
1 sixfold axis
Point Groups
6/mmm, 622, 6mm, -62m, 6/m, 6, -6
Example Gems
Emerald Aquamarine Morganite Apatite
Trigonal (Rhombohedral)

Characterized by one threefold axis.

Axes
a₁ = a₂ = a₃ ≠ c
Angles
α = β = 90°, γ = 120°
Minimum Symmetry
1 threefold axis
Point Groups
-3m, 32, 3m, -3, 3
Example Gems
Quartz Ruby Sapphire Tourmaline
Tetragonal

Characterized by one fourfold axis.

Axes
a = b ≠ c
Angles
α = β = γ = 90°
Minimum Symmetry
1 fourfold axis
Point Groups
4/mmm, 422, 4mm, -42m, 4/m, 4, -4
Example Gems
Zircon Rutile
Orthorhombic

Three twofold axes or two mirror planes.

Axes
a ≠ b ≠ c
Angles
α = β = γ = 90°
Minimum Symmetry
3 twofold axes or 2 planes
Point Groups
mmm, 222, mm2
Example Gems
Topaz Peridot Chrysoberyl Tanzanite
Monoclinic

One twofold axis or one mirror plane.

Axes
a ≠ b ≠ c
Angles
α = γ = 90°, β ≠ 90°
Minimum Symmetry
1 twofold axis or 1 plane
Point Groups
2/m, 2, m
Example Gems
Kunzite Orthoclase Jadeite
Triclinic

Lowest symmetry - no rotational symmetry.

Axes
a ≠ b ≠ c
Angles
α ≠ β ≠ γ ≠ 90°
Minimum Symmetry
No rotational symmetry
Point Groups
-1, 1
Example Gems
Turquoise Labradorite Rhodonite

Identifying Crystal Systems

When examining a crystal or gemstone, you can often determine its crystal system
by observing:

  • Crystal habit - The external shape and face arrangement
  • Optic character - Isotropic (cubic) vs. uniaxial vs. biaxial
  • Interference figure - Under polarized light microscopy
  • Cleavage directions - Related to internal symmetry

Quick Reference

Crystal Systems and Optic Character
System Optic Character RI Values
Cubic Isotropic Single RI (n)
Hexagonal, Trigonal, Tetragonal Uniaxial Two RI values (ω, ε)
Orthorhombic, Monoclinic, Triclinic Biaxial Three RI values (α, β, γ)

Common Gemstones by System

Cubic

  • Diamond
  • Spinel
  • Garnet (almandine, pyrope, grossular)
  • Fluorite

Trigonal

  • Quartz (amethyst, citrine)
  • Ruby
  • Sapphire
  • Tourmaline

Hexagonal

  • Emerald
  • Aquamarine
  • Morganite
  • Apatite

Orthorhombic

  • Topaz
  • Peridot
  • Chrysoberyl
  • Tanzanite

The 32 Point Groups

A point group is the set of symmetry operations (rotation axes, mirror planes, inversion
centre) that leave at least one point of a crystal unmoved. There are exactly 32 unique
combinations possible in crystals (the 32 crystal classes), expressed in Hermann–Mauguin
(H–M) notation.

Key notational elements:

  • n = n-fold rotation axis (2, 3, 4, or 6)
  • m = mirror plane
  • = rotoinversion axis (improper rotation)
  • = inversion centre
  • n/m = rotation axis perpendicular to a mirror plane

Point groups determine whether a crystal can be piezoelectric (no centre of inversion),
pyroelectric (polar point group), or optically active (enantiomorphic point group).

The gem species assignments below are drawn from standard mineralogical sources. Where
no common gem species is assigned to a class, the entry is shown as a dash; these classes
exist and are crystallographically established even without a prominent gem example.

Source: Schwarzenbach, Journal of Applied Crystallography, 2003.
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889803014778 [VERIFIED]; Read 3rd ed.
DOI: 10.4324/9780080507224 [VERIFIED]

The 32 Point Groups with gem species examples
System Point Group (H–M) Type Gem Example
Cubic 23 Enantiomorphic
Cubic m3̄ Centrosymmetric Pyrite
Cubic 432 Enantiomorphic
Cubic 4̄3m Non-centrosymmetric Diamond (some); sphalerite
Cubic m3̄m Holohedral (holosymmetric) Diamond (most gem diamonds); garnet; fluorite; spinel
Tetragonal 4 Polar
Tetragonal Non-centrosymmetric
Tetragonal 4/m Centrosymmetric Scheelite
Tetragonal 422 Enantiomorphic
Tetragonal 4mm Polar
Tetragonal 4̄2m Non-centrosymmetric Chalcopyrite
Tetragonal 4/mmm Holohedral Zircon; rutile; cassiterite; vesuvianite
Orthorhombic 222 Enantiomorphic
Orthorhombic mm2 Polar
Orthorhombic mmm Holohedral Topaz; peridot/olivine; tanzanite/zoisite; andalusite; danburite
Trigonal 3 Polar, enantiomorphic
Trigonal Centrosymmetric
Trigonal 32 Enantiomorphic Quartz (explains optical activity – left/right handed)
Trigonal 3m Polar Tourmaline (piezoelectric/pyroelectric); calcite group
Trigonal 3̄m Holohedral Corundum (ruby, sapphire); hematite
Hexagonal 6 Polar, enantiomorphic
Hexagonal Non-centrosymmetric
Hexagonal 6/m Centrosymmetric Apatite
Hexagonal 622 Enantiomorphic
Hexagonal 6mm Polar Wurtzite
Hexagonal 6̄m2 Non-centrosymmetric Benitoite
Hexagonal 6/mmm Holohedral Beryl (emerald, aquamarine, morganite)
Monoclinic 2 Polar, enantiomorphic
Monoclinic m Polar
Monoclinic 2/m Centrosymmetric Orthoclase/microcline; diopside; jadeite; spodumene; malachite
Triclinic 1 Polar
Triclinic Centrosymmetric Labradorite/plagioclase; kyanite; rhodonite; turquoise

Point Group Notes

Several point groups have gemmologically significant consequences:

  • Quartz (point group 32): the enantiomorphic class explains why quartz is optically
    active (rotates plane of polarisation), exists as left-handed and right-handed crystals,
    and shows the Brazil and Dauphiné twin laws. No centre of inversion → piezoelectric.
  • Tourmaline (point group 3m): polar axis along c responsible for piezoelectricity and
    pyroelectricity. The polar nature also produces pyroelectric discharge when temperature
    changes – tourmaline crystals attract dust.
  • Corundum (point group 3̄m): has a centre of inversion (the 3̄ inversion axis);
    therefore neither piezoelectric nor optically active. Uniaxial negative with pleochroism
    oriented along the c-axis.
  • Diamond (point group m3̄m): highest possible cubic symmetry (Oh); isotropic; single RI;
    no birefringence, no pleochroism.
  • Benitoite (point group 6̄m2): hexagonal symmetry class; notable for intense SWUV
    fluorescence and dispersion equal to diamond (0.044); uniaxial positive.

Miller Indices – 3-Index and 4-Index Notation

Miller indices {hkl} describe the orientation of a crystal face or plane by the reciprocals
of its fractional intercepts on the crystallographic axes.

Three-index notation {hkl} – used for cubic, tetragonal, orthorhombic, monoclinic, and
triclinic systems (three axes: a, b, c):

  • {100}: intercepts a at 1, parallel to b and c.
  • {111}: intercepts all three axes equally – the octahedral face in cubic.
  • {110}: intercepts a and b at 1, parallel to c – the dodecahedral face in cubic.

Four-index (Bravais–Miller) notation {hkil} – required for trigonal and hexagonal
systems, which have three equivalent horizontal axes (a₁, a₂, a₃) at 120° and one vertical
c-axis:

  • The closure relation i = −(h+k) always holds; i is not an independent variable but
    makes the symmetry equivalence of faces explicit in the notation.
  • {10-10}: the hexagonal prism face. i = -(1+0) = -1, confirming h + k + i = 0.
  • {0001}: the basal pinacoid – perpendicular to the c-axis; the "table" of a hexagonal crystal.
  • {10-11}: the rhombohedral face in trigonal – the twin and parting plane of corundum.

Why the redundant index? In a 6-fold-symmetric hexagonal crystal there are six
equivalent prism faces. The 4-index notation makes this equivalence explicit: {10-10},
{01-10}, {-1100}, {-1010}, {0-110}, {1-100} are all the same form, and the notation
allows this to be seen by inspection.

Source: Schwarzenbach, Journal of Applied Crystallography, 2003.
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889803014778 [VERIFIED]

Worked examples

Crystal / face Notation Notes
Cubic diamond, octahedral face {111} Three equal intercepts on a, b, c
Cubic diamond, cube face {100} Intersects a; parallel to b and c
Quartz (trigonal), prism face {10-10} Four-index; i = -(1+0) = -1; the common m-face
Quartz, pyramid face {10-11} Four-index; also the rhombohedral face r
Corundum, basal pinacoid {0001} Perpendicular to c; parting plane
Corundum, rhombohedral parting {10-11} Twin and parting plane; four-index required (trigonal)

Examination note

The distinction between 3-index and 4-index notation is a common examination point at
Diploma level. The only formula to remember is: i = −(h+k).

Understanding this relation explains why trigonal/hexagonal crystals have 6-fold or
3-fold equivalence of side faces – each set of equivalent faces has the same set of
|h|, |k|, |i| values in different permutations.

Parting (False Cleavage)

Parting is a tendency for a crystal to break along planes that are not true cleavage planes.
It resembles cleavage (producing flat, reflective fracture surfaces) but is caused by
repeated twinning lamellae or by exsolution of a second phase along a crystallographic plane.

Distinction from cleavage:

  • Cleavage is universal – every crystal of the species will cleave along the same planes,
    because the planes reflect inherently weak bonds in the crystal structure.
  • Parting is contingent – only crystals that happen to be twinned or to have undergone
    exsolution show parting. It may be restricted to parts of the crystal and is not universal
    across all specimens of the species.

Source: Read 3rd ed. DOI: 10.4324/9780080507224 [VERIFIED];
Pignatelli 2024, DOI: 10.1007/s00710-024-00858-1 [VERIFIED]

Corundum parting

Corundum (ruby and sapphire) has no true cleavage. It shows two parting directions from
polysynthetic twinning:

  • {10-11} rhombohedral parting – the most prominent; arises from repeated polysynthetic
    twinning on the rhombohedral plane. Visible as parallel flat steps on broken corundum
    rough, and as iridescent flat internal planes in faceted stones.
  • {0001} basal parting – from twinning on the basal pinacoid; less consistent.

A common Diploma examination error is stating "corundum has perfect basal cleavage."
The correct answer is: corundum has no cleavage; the flat surfaces observed are
parting along twin planes.

Other parting examples

Mineral Parting plane Cause
Corundum (ruby, sapphire) {10-11} and {0001} Polysynthetic twinning on those planes
Pyroxene (diopside, enstatite) {100} Exsolution or twinning; combined with {110} cleavage gives two-direction breakage
Magnetite {111} Spinel-law twinning; relevant when magnetite is an inclusion