Natural vs Synthetic Indicators
Distinguishing natural gemstones from synthetics using inclusion evidence.
Introduction
Inclusions provide crucial evidence for distinguishing natural gemstones from
their synthetic counterparts. While synthetics may have the same chemical
composition and crystal structure, their formation conditions differ dramatically,
leaving characteristic internal features.
Natural Indicators Overview
Natural Indicators
- Mineral crystal inclusions
- Three-phase inclusions
- Fingerprint patterns
- Irregular colour zoning
- Natural growth patterns
- Stress fractures around crystals
Synthetic Indicators
- Curved striae (flame fusion)
- Gas bubbles (flame fusion)
- Flux inclusions (flux growth)
- Chevron/zigzag zoning (hydrothermal)
- Seed plates (hydrothermal)
- Platinum/gold flakes (flux)
Flame Fusion (Verneuil) Synthetics
Flame fusion is the oldest and most common method for synthetic corundum and spinel:
Characteristic inclusions:
- Curved striae - Curved growth lines (most diagnostic)
- Gas bubbles - Round or elongated bubbles, often in strings
- Unmelted powder - Rare, small grains of starting material
Observation tips:
- Curved striae best seen with immersion and polarized light
- Bubbles may be very small - use high magnification
- Striae follow the curved boule shape
Flux-Grown Synthetics
Flux-grown synthetics crystallize from a molten flux solution:
Characteristic inclusions:
- Flux inclusions - Wispy, veil-like, or fingerprint-like patterns
- Platinum/gold flakes - Metallic crucible remnants
- Flux residue - Glassy or crystalline flux material
- Seed remnants - If grown on a seed crystal
Important distinctions:
- Flux inclusions can resemble natural fingerprints
- Look for metallic flakes (not present in nature)
- Flux has distinctive appearance different from natural fluids
| Feature | Flux Synthetic | Natural |
|---|---|---|
| Fingerprint pattern | Often present | Often present |
| Metallic flakes | Pt, Au, Ir possible | Never present |
| Mineral crystals | Rare, only flux | Various species |
| Three-phase inclusions | Never | Common in emerald |
Hydrothermal Synthetics
Hydrothermal synthetics grow from aqueous solutions at high pressure:
Characteristic inclusions:
- Chevron/zigzag zoning - Distinctive angular growth patterns
- Seed plate - Remnant of the seed crystal
- Breadcrumb inclusions - Small, white, scattered particles
- Nail-head spicules - Elongated, pointed inclusions
Common hydrothermal synthetics:
CVD and HPHT Diamond
Lab-grown diamonds require special attention:
HPHT (High Pressure High Temperature):
- Metallic flux inclusions (Fe, Ni, Co)
- Cross-shaped or irregular patterns
- Strong magnetism possible
- Distinctive fluorescence patterns
CVD (Chemical Vapor Deposition):
- Often very clean
- May show strain patterns
- Point defects from process
- Distinctive spectroscopy features
| Feature | Natural Diamond | HPHT Synthetic | CVD Synthetic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mineral inclusions | Garnet, olivine, etc. | Metallic flux | Rare, if any |
| Growth patterns | Octahedral | Cuboctahedral | Layered |
| Fluorescence | Variable | Often unusual | Often unusual |
| Magnetism | No | Often yes (flux) | No |
Synthetic Spinel Indicators
Synthetic spinel is commonly produced by flame fusion:
Key features:
- Gas bubbles - Very common, often in clouds or strings
- Curved striae - Similar to synthetic corundum
- Anomalous double refraction (ADR) - Strong strain patterns
- High clarity - Often cleaner than natural
Natural Spinel
- Octahedral negative crystals
- Fingerprint patterns
- Zircon haloes
- Mineral crystal inclusions
- Irregular colour zoning
Synthetic Spinel
- Gas bubbles
- Curved striae (flame fusion)
- Very high clarity
- Strong ADR under polariscope
- No mineral inclusions
Examination Protocol
When Inclusions Aren't Enough
Some cases require advanced testing beyond microscopy:
Challenging scenarios:
- Very clean natural stones with few inclusions
- High-quality flux synthetics
- CVD diamonds (often very clean)
- Treated naturals with altered inclusions
Additional testing methods:
- Spectroscopy (FTIR, Raman, UV-Vis)
- Fluorescence imaging
- Trace element analysis
- Photoluminescence mapping
When microscopic evidence is inconclusive, always recommend advanced testing
by a qualified gemmological laboratory.