Crystal Systems
The seven crystal systems and their characteristic symmetry elements.
Overview
All crystals belong to one of seven crystal systems, classified by their unit cell
geometry and symmetry elements. Understanding these systems is fundamental to
crystallography and gem identification.
Crystal systems are defined by the relationship between crystallographic axes
(a, b, c) and the angles between them (α, β, γ). Each system has characteristic
symmetry elements that determine possible crystal forms.
Symmetry Elements
Rotation Axes
2-fold, 3-fold, 4-fold, 6-fold rotational symmetry
Mirror Planes
Reflection symmetry planes
Center of Symmetry
Inversion through a point
The Seven Systems
The highest symmetry system with four threefold axes.
Characterized by one sixfold axis.
Characterized by one threefold axis.
Characterized by one fourfold axis.
Three twofold axes or two mirror planes.
One twofold axis or one mirror plane.
Lowest symmetry - no rotational symmetry.
Identifying Crystal Systems
When examining a crystal or gemstone, you can often determine its crystal system
by observing:
- Crystal habit - The external shape and face arrangement
- Optic character - Isotropic (cubic) vs. uniaxial vs. biaxial
- Interference figure - Under polarized light microscopy
- Cleavage directions - Related to internal symmetry
Quick Reference
| System | Optic Character | RI Values |
|---|---|---|
| Cubic | Isotropic | Single RI (n) |
| Hexagonal, Trigonal, Tetragonal | Uniaxial | Two RI values (ω, ε) |
| Orthorhombic, Monoclinic, Triclinic | Biaxial | Three RI values (α, β, γ) |
Common Gemstones by System
Cubic
- Diamond
- Spinel
- Garnet (almandine, pyrope, grossular)
- Fluorite
Trigonal
- Quartz (amethyst, citrine)
- Ruby
- Sapphire
- Tourmaline
Hexagonal
- Emerald
- Aquamarine
- Morganite
- Apatite
Orthorhombic
- Topaz
- Peridot
- Chrysoberyl
- Tanzanite
The 32 Point Groups
A point group is the set of symmetry operations (rotation axes, mirror planes, inversion
centre) that leave at least one point of a crystal unmoved. There are exactly 32 unique
combinations possible in crystals (the 32 crystal classes), expressed in Hermann–Mauguin
(H–M) notation.
Key notational elements:
- n = n-fold rotation axis (2, 3, 4, or 6)
- m = mirror plane
- n̄ = rotoinversion axis (improper rotation)
- 1̄ = inversion centre
- n/m = rotation axis perpendicular to a mirror plane
Point groups determine whether a crystal can be piezoelectric (no centre of inversion),
pyroelectric (polar point group), or optically active (enantiomorphic point group).
The gem species assignments below are drawn from standard mineralogical sources. Where
no common gem species is assigned to a class, the entry is shown as a dash; these classes
exist and are crystallographically established even without a prominent gem example.
Source: Schwarzenbach, Journal of Applied Crystallography, 2003.
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889803014778 [VERIFIED]; Read 3rd ed.
DOI: 10.4324/9780080507224 [VERIFIED]
| System | Point Group (H–M) | Type | Gem Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cubic | 23 | Enantiomorphic | — |
| Cubic | m3̄ | Centrosymmetric | Pyrite |
| Cubic | 432 | Enantiomorphic | — |
| Cubic | 4̄3m | Non-centrosymmetric | Diamond (some); sphalerite |
| Cubic | m3̄m | Holohedral (holosymmetric) | Diamond (most gem diamonds); garnet; fluorite; spinel |
| Tetragonal | 4 | Polar | — |
| Tetragonal | 4̄ | Non-centrosymmetric | — |
| Tetragonal | 4/m | Centrosymmetric | Scheelite |
| Tetragonal | 422 | Enantiomorphic | — |
| Tetragonal | 4mm | Polar | — |
| Tetragonal | 4̄2m | Non-centrosymmetric | Chalcopyrite |
| Tetragonal | 4/mmm | Holohedral | Zircon; rutile; cassiterite; vesuvianite |
| Orthorhombic | 222 | Enantiomorphic | — |
| Orthorhombic | mm2 | Polar | — |
| Orthorhombic | mmm | Holohedral | Topaz; peridot/olivine; tanzanite/zoisite; andalusite; danburite |
| Trigonal | 3 | Polar, enantiomorphic | — |
| Trigonal | 3̄ | Centrosymmetric | — |
| Trigonal | 32 | Enantiomorphic | Quartz (explains optical activity – left/right handed) |
| Trigonal | 3m | Polar | Tourmaline (piezoelectric/pyroelectric); calcite group |
| Trigonal | 3̄m | Holohedral | Corundum (ruby, sapphire); hematite |
| Hexagonal | 6 | Polar, enantiomorphic | — |
| Hexagonal | 6̄ | Non-centrosymmetric | — |
| Hexagonal | 6/m | Centrosymmetric | Apatite |
| Hexagonal | 622 | Enantiomorphic | — |
| Hexagonal | 6mm | Polar | Wurtzite |
| Hexagonal | 6̄m2 | Non-centrosymmetric | Benitoite |
| Hexagonal | 6/mmm | Holohedral | Beryl (emerald, aquamarine, morganite) |
| Monoclinic | 2 | Polar, enantiomorphic | — |
| Monoclinic | m | Polar | — |
| Monoclinic | 2/m | Centrosymmetric | Orthoclase/microcline; diopside; jadeite; spodumene; malachite |
| Triclinic | 1 | Polar | — |
| Triclinic | 1̄ | Centrosymmetric | Labradorite/plagioclase; kyanite; rhodonite; turquoise |
Point Group Notes
Several point groups have gemmologically significant consequences:
- Quartz (point group 32): the enantiomorphic class explains why quartz is optically
active (rotates plane of polarisation), exists as left-handed and right-handed crystals,
and shows the Brazil and Dauphiné twin laws. No centre of inversion → piezoelectric. - Tourmaline (point group 3m): polar axis along c responsible for piezoelectricity and
pyroelectricity. The polar nature also produces pyroelectric discharge when temperature
changes – tourmaline crystals attract dust. - Corundum (point group 3̄m): has a centre of inversion (the 3̄ inversion axis);
therefore neither piezoelectric nor optically active. Uniaxial negative with pleochroism
oriented along the c-axis. - Diamond (point group m3̄m): highest possible cubic symmetry (Oh); isotropic; single RI;
no birefringence, no pleochroism. - Benitoite (point group 6̄m2): hexagonal symmetry class; notable for intense SWUV
fluorescence and dispersion equal to diamond (0.044); uniaxial positive.
Miller Indices – 3-Index and 4-Index Notation
Miller indices {hkl} describe the orientation of a crystal face or plane by the reciprocals
of its fractional intercepts on the crystallographic axes.
Three-index notation {hkl} – used for cubic, tetragonal, orthorhombic, monoclinic, and
triclinic systems (three axes: a, b, c):
- {100}: intercepts a at 1, parallel to b and c.
- {111}: intercepts all three axes equally – the octahedral face in cubic.
- {110}: intercepts a and b at 1, parallel to c – the dodecahedral face in cubic.
Four-index (Bravais–Miller) notation {hkil} – required for trigonal and hexagonal
systems, which have three equivalent horizontal axes (a₁, a₂, a₃) at 120° and one vertical
c-axis:
- The closure relation i = −(h+k) always holds; i is not an independent variable but
makes the symmetry equivalence of faces explicit in the notation. - {10-10}: the hexagonal prism face. i = -(1+0) = -1, confirming h + k + i = 0.
- {0001}: the basal pinacoid – perpendicular to the c-axis; the "table" of a hexagonal crystal.
- {10-11}: the rhombohedral face in trigonal – the twin and parting plane of corundum.
Why the redundant index? In a 6-fold-symmetric hexagonal crystal there are six
equivalent prism faces. The 4-index notation makes this equivalence explicit: {10-10},
{01-10}, {-1100}, {-1010}, {0-110}, {1-100} are all the same form, and the notation
allows this to be seen by inspection.
Source: Schwarzenbach, Journal of Applied Crystallography, 2003.
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889803014778 [VERIFIED]
Worked examples
| Crystal / face | Notation | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Cubic diamond, octahedral face | {111} | Three equal intercepts on a, b, c |
| Cubic diamond, cube face | {100} | Intersects a; parallel to b and c |
| Quartz (trigonal), prism face | {10-10} | Four-index; i = -(1+0) = -1; the common m-face |
| Quartz, pyramid face | {10-11} | Four-index; also the rhombohedral face r |
| Corundum, basal pinacoid | {0001} | Perpendicular to c; parting plane |
| Corundum, rhombohedral parting | {10-11} | Twin and parting plane; four-index required (trigonal) |
Examination note
The distinction between 3-index and 4-index notation is a common examination point at
Diploma level. The only formula to remember is: i = −(h+k).
Understanding this relation explains why trigonal/hexagonal crystals have 6-fold or
3-fold equivalence of side faces – each set of equivalent faces has the same set of
|h|, |k|, |i| values in different permutations.
Parting (False Cleavage)
Parting is a tendency for a crystal to break along planes that are not true cleavage planes.
It resembles cleavage (producing flat, reflective fracture surfaces) but is caused by
repeated twinning lamellae or by exsolution of a second phase along a crystallographic plane.
Distinction from cleavage:
- Cleavage is universal – every crystal of the species will cleave along the same planes,
because the planes reflect inherently weak bonds in the crystal structure. - Parting is contingent – only crystals that happen to be twinned or to have undergone
exsolution show parting. It may be restricted to parts of the crystal and is not universal
across all specimens of the species.
Source: Read 3rd ed. DOI: 10.4324/9780080507224 [VERIFIED];
Pignatelli 2024, DOI: 10.1007/s00710-024-00858-1 [VERIFIED]
Corundum parting
Corundum (ruby and sapphire) has no true cleavage. It shows two parting directions from
polysynthetic twinning:
- {10-11} rhombohedral parting – the most prominent; arises from repeated polysynthetic
twinning on the rhombohedral plane. Visible as parallel flat steps on broken corundum
rough, and as iridescent flat internal planes in faceted stones. - {0001} basal parting – from twinning on the basal pinacoid; less consistent.
A common Diploma examination error is stating "corundum has perfect basal cleavage."
The correct answer is: corundum has no cleavage; the flat surfaces observed are
parting along twin planes.
Other parting examples
| Mineral | Parting plane | Cause |
|---|---|---|
| Corundum (ruby, sapphire) | {10-11} and {0001} | Polysynthetic twinning on those planes |
| Pyroxene (diopside, enstatite) | {100} | Exsolution or twinning; combined with {110} cleavage gives two-direction breakage |
| Magnetite | {111} | Spinel-law twinning; relevant when magnetite is an inclusion |